Votan Learning Portal
  • Votan Learning Portal
  • Company profile
  • Impact Management Platform
    • Global Disclosure Portal
      • Navigating the Evolving Consumer Market with Votan
      • Votan Passports
    • Climate Launchpad
      • KYE (Know your emissions)
      • Carbon reporting protocols and standards
        • Comparison: GHG protocol vs ISO 14064
        • Standards in the GHG Protocol
        • Other standards for carbon accounting
        • Higg index
          • Higg index video explainer
          • Problems addressed by Higg index
          • Why was the Higg Index developed?
          • Higg Index alternatives
          • Higg vs ESG
          • Higg vs GHG and ISO
          • Higg reporting
          • Higg index costs
      • Emission factors
      • Product roadmap
  • Perks and Benefits
  • Use Cases for Votan's Platform
    • Product Verification
    • Retargeting
    • Recycling and Circular economy
    • GHG Reporting
    • Claim Verification
    • Material Traceability
  • Regulations
    • Region-Specific Detailed Analysis
    • European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)
    • Sustainable finance taxonomies
    • Fines and costs
    • EU bans ‘misleading’ environmental claims that rely on offsetting
    • ISO standards for sustainable brands and products
      • ISO 14001:2015
      • ISO 14064:2018
      • ISO 26000
      • ISO 37301
      • ISO 27001:2013
      • IS0 14007 and 14008
      • IS0 20400:2017
      • IS0 37001:2016
      • IS0 50001:2011
      • IS0 14040 and 14044
      • ISO/WD 53001
  • Latest Updates
    • Singapore to Mandate Climate Disclosures for Listed and Large Non-Listed Companies
    • Beyond Greenwashing: Why Big Companies Are Now Demanding Sustainable Suppliers
    • The EU Mandates Digital Product Passports: A Step Towards Sustainability
    • EU’s Digital Product Passports: A Revolution in Sustainable Textiles
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Regulations

EU bans ‘misleading’ environmental claims that rely on offsetting

The European Parliament has taken steps to address misleading environmental claims by banning terms like "climate neutral" and "climate positive" that rely on offsetting. This decision is part of a broader crackdown on deceptive environmental labeling. The ban also encompasses terms such as "environmentally friendly," "natural," "biodegradable," and "eco" unless there is supporting evidence.

Moreover, the directive introduces a total ban on using carbon offsetting schemes to substantiate environmental claims. The move is prompted by concerns about the reliability and impact of carbon offsetting practices, which have been used to justify labeling products as "carbon neutral." Such claims can imply that consumers can engage in activities like flying, purchasing new items, or consuming specific foods without exacerbating the climate crisis.

Under the new directive, only sustainability labels backed by approved certification schemes will be allowed in the European Union. This regulation aims to ensure transparency and credibility in environmental claims, preventing companies from making misleading assertions about the environmental attributes of their products.

The directive comes after months of negotiations on how environmental claims should be regulated in the EU. A deal was reached in September and was approved by lawmakers, giving member states two years to implement the new rules.

This decision is seen as a significant step in combating greenwashing, where companies make exaggerated or false claims about the environmental benefits of their products or practices. It reflects a commitment to more honest commercial practices and aims to empower consumers to make informed choices by eliminating misleading environmental advertising. The ban on terms like "climate-neutral" based on CO2 offsetting is particularly highlighted as a positive step toward addressing deceptive practices in marketing.

PreviousFines and costsNextISO standards for sustainable brands and products

Last updated 1 year ago